International Liaison Committee |
||
| Co-Chairs | Liaison | |
Jared Windhauser, CFM |
Adri Verwey |
Vacant |
| Features | Committee Information | |
| Purpose | 2007 - 2008 Goals & Objectives | |
| Vision | ||
| Links & Publications | 2006 - 2007 Status Report | |
| Flood Standards in Foreign Countires | ||
| No Adverse Impact Floodplain Management | ||
| Skills Assessment of the International Liaison Committee (.xls) | ||
|
||
|
Supporting the Mission, Goals, and Objectives of ASFPM... We serve as a link to the World for exchanging ideas & experience on the wise-use of floodplains, water resources, and sustainable environments, promoting synthesis & understanding to lead us forward. |
||
Best Practices on Flood Prevention, Protection and Mitigation in the EU ASFPM International Brochure April 2003 (.pdf 2.89 mb) Posted 04-04-02: Floodplain Management and Mitigation in France See the ASFPM/PADF flood warning project in Honduras. Consider a Local and Community Level Disaster Risk Management Course. Copan, Honduras: Tourism & Floods | Associated Maps (.pdf) Spanish Language |
||
2007-2008 Goals and ObjectivesINTERNAL FOCUS:-
EXTERNAL FOCUS:-
COMBINED FOCUS:-
|
||
|
The International Committee made considerable contributions and progress in meeting our 2006-2007 goals and objectives. Noteworthy key points would be (1) the attendance of ASFPM Community and Outreach Coordinator and International Committee Co-Chair at the “First Inter-American Meeting of Ministers and High Level Authorities on Sustainable Development” Summit hosted by the Organization of American States in Santa Cruz, Bolivia; (2) Committee Chair Attendance at the Inter-American Development Bank Vendor Exposition in Washington, D.C.; (3) Spanish Translation of the Coastal NAI Handbook; (4) the first-ever International Track during our Annual ASFPM Conference in Norfolk, Virginia. In order to establish sufficient interest for an International Track, the Committee Co-Chair maintained consistent and deliberate communications with potential international authors, companies and key players, resulting in 33 papers submitted for only 9 specific conference track slots within the program! Additional coordination took place between the Committee and the Conference Program Chair, plus supporting cast, for establishment of the International Track. Below are additional comments regarding our Committee Status according to the previously established procedures of reporting, that is, upon the (1) Internal Focus; (2) External Focus; (3) Combined Focus. INTERNAL FOCUS 1. DEVELOP A VISION and MISSION STATEMENT for the INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE
2. MAINTAIN CONTACT THROUGH EMAIL/CONFERENCE CALLS with INTERESTED MEMBERS in ORDER to INTERACT and PROVIDE IDEAS
3. RESEARCH and SHOWCASE INTERNATIONAL “NAI” INITIATIVES for INCORPORATION into ASFPM STRATEGIES
EXTERNAL FOCUS 4. CONTINUE to TARGET NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES WHERE COMMITTEE INVOLVEMENT WILL BE WELCOMED
6. TARGET INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONALS to SPEAK at UPCOMING CONFERENCES
COMBINED FOCUS 7. DEVELOP ONE STRONG GRANT PROPOSAL for FUTURE INTERNATIONAL WORK
8. DEVELOP and MARKET INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM for CERTIFYING FLOODPLAIN MANAGERS
9. DEVELOP and MARKET BASIC FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT COURSE INTERNATIONALLY
|
||
Flood Standards in Foreign Countries The paper discusses flood standards or “floodplain management” in Canada, England, France, Italy, Norway and the European Union in order to stimulate discussion regarding the use of the 1% (100-year) flood standard and how it relates to those used in the United States. |
||
NO ADVERSE IMPACT FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION Flood losses in the United States continue to escalate. From the early
1900’s they have increased six fold, approaching a cost $6 billion
annually. This increase in the level of
damage to public and private property, amounts spent on disaster relief,
disruption in lives and businesses, and loss of habitat and other water-related
resources has occurred in spite of nearly a century of flood control, the
implementation of floodplain management standards and the mapping of hundreds
of thousands of miles of floodplains. The general trend is for flood losses
to increase every decade and it is fairly obvious that the policies of
governments at all levels, combined with existing market forces, are leading
to more intense uses of flood prone lands throughout. In 2000, the Association
of State Flood Plain Managers recommended a “No Adverse Impact” approach
for local government, state, and federal floodplain management.
Future land and water uses which will flood new areas, increase
flood heights,
increase erosion, or otherwise increase flood and erosion damages
to public and private property will not be permitted. The NAI approach is not intended as a rigid rule of conduct. Rather it may be applied as a general guide for a landowner and communities in watersheds and floodplain areas which may adversely impact other properties or communities. It is a shift from substituting local and individual accountability with federal government programs. At its broadest level, NAI is about local government taking steps to reduce the drain on national resources, as well as local and state resources. NAI empowers the local community and its citizens to build stakeholders at the local level. The statement of the goal is simple, “where the action of one property owner does not adversely impact the rights of other property owners, as measured by increased flood peaks, flood stage, flood velocity, and erosion and sedimentation”. Furthermore:
While the NAI approach will result in reduced damages for the 1% chance flood event, its true strength is that it virtually ensures that future development actions which impact the floodplain must be part of a locally adopted plan. This removes the mentality that floodplain management is something imposed by a federal agency. Giving locals the flexibility to adopt comprehensive local management plans, which would be recognized by federal agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency and others as the acceptable management approach in that community, will provide the community with control and support for continued innovative approaches. ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN Since 2000, ASFPM has embarked on numerous steps for successes with promoting NAI. Through continued outreach, many communities are now aware of NAI’s existence and are eager to participate. Furthermore, through the support of ASFPM the NAI Toolkit was produced and made available via multiple avenues to local government officials, elected representatives and citizens in communities of all sizes, especially those which are flood-prone. The NAI Toolkit is a book-type publication featuring 10 varying community-based case studies. ASFPM has continued to spin off additional products from this publication to facilitate ways communities can be successful in helping themselves. LESSONS LEARNED AND CHALLENGES NAI is a managing principle that is easy to communicate and from a policy perspective tough to challenge. However, working with communities to embrace this new approach highlighted the need to ensure that this approach is compatible with federal, state and local laws. ASFPM has worked to produce a document titled “Government Liability and No Adverse Impact Floodplain Management” which is based upon review of the legal literature as well as federal and state case law concerning floodplain regulations. This approach will ease the local communities perceptions of the NAI approach not being legally compatible with existing floodplain regulations. SUGGESTION FOR FUTURE ACTION Some key steps include:
CONTACT Larry A. Larson, P.E., CFM, ASFPM Executive Director – larry@floods.org For
more information or full copies of the ASFPM documents on flood
policy, including a published article on No Adverse Impact, the NAI Toolkit
and other publications contact memberhelp@floods.org. |
||
This page was last updated on October 1, 2007.
| Corporate Partners | Agency Partners | Contact Us |

